Latest Activity

Helen Tremaine posted events
12 hours ago
Christine Clifford posted a discussion
Helen Ford posted events
Sep 15
A discussion started by Paul Lincoln was featured
Sep 12


There are four Golden Lane Estate related facebook accounts and you can follow them here: goldenlaneEC1 

Golden Lane Estate / RCS site 

Save Bernard Morgan House

City of London

The Court of Appeal determined that the leaseholders of Great Arthur House were not liable (subject to some exceptions), under the terms of their leases to contribute to substantial works to the structure and exterior of the building which were being carried out by the reversioner, the City of London Corporation.

The scope of the landlord’s ability under the leases at Great Arthur House to recover the sums it expended on ‘specified repairs’, did not extend to structural defects, even when works of repair (in the form of remedying damage and deterioration over the time during which the defect has existed) would be carried out at the same time.

The case considers the interplay between remedying structural defects and repair and the sometimes overlapping nature of the two concepts. The case is therefore of relevance to anyone advising in the field of Landlord & Tenant law, and will be of interest to many lessees and landlords who wish to understand the scope of their obligations and liabilities under existing leases. 

Views: 725


Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

But are the City appealing to the Supreme Court as they threatened?

Tim, permission to appeal was refused by the Supreme Court.



© 2023   Created by Paul Lincoln.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service