welcome

The Golden Lane Estate website is run by GLE residents (GLE website comms team) and supported by the Golden Lane Residents' Association.

The forums are moderated.  Any comments which appear to be abusive or potentially libellous or which contravene the terms of service under which the site is licensed by the service provider Ning will be removed. 

Privacy Policy

Forum

GOLDEN LANE RESIDENTS' ASSOCIATION

Discussion of matters arising from GLERA.

95 discussions

MAJOR WORKS & PROJECTS

3 discussions

RCS SITE CITY OF LONDON ACADEMY AND HOUSING

Plans for developing the Richard Cloudsley site

47 discussions

BERNARD MORGAN HOUSE

Plans for developing the Bernard Morgan House site.

16 discussions

COMMENT ON GOLDEN LANE

Comment on all aspects of Golden Lane life

1163 discussions

COMMUNITY CENTRE

1 discussions

HEALTH & WELLBEING

12 discussions

ESTATE OFFICE ANNOUNCEMENTS

366 discussions

ITEMS FOR SALE OR RECYCLE

177 discussions

@GoldenLaneEC1

Text Box

Facebook

There are two Golden Lane Estate related facebook accounts and you can follow them here:

GLERA and City of London

Interesting article for leaseholders concerned about significant bills in the coming years:

https://www.theguardian.com/money/2017/jul/31/owners-ex-local-autho...

Views: 56

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I can remember a time when you couldn't get a mortgage to but a leasehold flat. On local authority owned estates it seems wrong that leaseholders or tenants should pay towards neglect
Does Florrie’s Law not apply to things like the Great Arthur curtain wall replacement? I really need to get out more, I had never heard of it. From the article:

"...Eric Pickles, then secretary of state for communities and local government, introducing Florrie’s Law, which caps the amount local authority leaseholders have to pay for repairs to £10,000 (or £15,000 in London) over a five-year period.
But there’s a caveat: it only applies if repairs are partly funded by a central government grant. If not, the council can pass the entire cost to leaseholders."

Is that the case here? Excuse my ignorance. I know the leaseholders are having to shell out a whole lot more than £15,000.
I do know the City bought itself out of the government's Council house 'subsidy'. This is the old and still existing scheme where all, council rents went to the exchequer and then were redistributed back to councils and called subsidy. Some councils go more or less back depending on who was in government. A few years ago they offered a buyout of the scheme and as a wealthy borough took it.

Reply to Discussion

RSS

© 2018   Created by Paul Lincoln.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service