Latest Activity

Alex replied to Paul Lincoln's discussion Cancellation of windows consultation event
"They’re trying to squeeze every penny out of us Residents in what was once England’s…"
yesterday
Tim Godsmark replied to Paul Lincoln's discussion Cancellation of windows consultation event
"Hi Christine, The challenge was over the nature of the replacement as "structural"…"
yesterday
Tim Godsmark replied to Tim Godsmark's discussion Open Letter to the Planning Committee
yesterday
Chamberpot Bowell & Pond replied to Golden Lane Estate Office's discussion Future works programme for Fann Street, Golden Lane and Viscount Street
"It says “An outline plan of the proposed works is attached to this letter“, would it be…"
yesterday

Forum

HEALTH & WELLBEING

104 discussions

ESTATE OFFICE ANNOUNCEMENTS

564 discussions

GENERAL COMMENTS & QUERIES

1298 discussions

MAJOR WORKS & PROJECTS

116 discussions

COLPAI

Site of former Richard Cloudesley School

167 discussions

BERNARD MORGAN HOUSE

16 discussions

COMMUNITY CENTRE

17 discussions

ITEMS FOR SALE OR RECYCLE

210 discussions

@GoldenLaneEC1

Text Box

Facebook

There are four Golden Lane Estate related facebook accounts and you can follow them here: goldenlaneEC1 

Golden Lane Estate / RCS site 

Save Bernard Morgan House

City of London

CITY’S STANDARDS COMMITTEE ABOLISHED

In January 2018, a resident councillor of unimpeachable integrity successfully challenged the City of London Corporation on behalf of her constituents. Two weeks later, the Corporation referred her for prosecution which proved to be entirely groundless, and for two prejudiced hearings by its Standards Committee. The whole process cost tens of thousands of pounds of public money, and resulted in no sanction.

 

In December 2018, two motions were proposed in the City’s Court of Common Council in response to this scandal. Supported by only 14 out of elected 125 members, the motions aimed to reform:

 

(1) the Corporation’s “dispensations" policy, by removing undue restrictions on resident members speaking and voting on matters affecting their constituents, and

 

(2) the Corporation’s standards proceedings, by replacing members on the assessment, hearing and appeal bodies with independent persons.  

 

The Policy Chair ambushed the first motion with an amendment to preserve the restrictive policy on “dispensations" to vote. A debate on the second motion was prevented by a member moving "that the question now be put”, after which the motion was overwhelmingly voted down.

 

In April 2019, 1,200 City residents signed a petition in which they declared that they had no confidence in the Corporation’s standards regime, and called for it to be reformed in line with the motions.

 

The campaign for standards reform continued, waged by only a handful of members, but with strong resident support and external publicity. It was aided by the propensity of the Standards Committee to make the wrong decision practically every time it acted. 

 

In March 2020, a further case exposed in open Court the folly of members judging each other. Further motions for reform were proposed in June and October 2020, but were both neutered by amendments. 

 

Even the Corporation-friendly Lisvane report, published in September 2020, recognised that the City’s standards regime was not fit for purpose. The report recommended its radical overhaul, together with the abolition of the Standards Committee.

 

Eventually, in January 2021, the Court of Common Council adopted those recommendations.The aims of the two motions proposed more than two years earlier were finally achieved. The Standards Committee has since disappeared into oblivion. 

 

The success of the standards reform campaign - in the face of determined resistance by the Corporation’s leadership - proves that the Corporation, with all its financial, legal and PR resources, can be defeated.

 

This should encourage City residents to take further action against the lack of democratic accountability in the Corporation. They can do so by signing this petition, which calls for the reform of its planning process, another area in which residents are disenfranchised.

Views: 92

Add a Comment

You need to be a member of goldenlaneestate.org to add comments!

Join goldenlaneestate.org

© 2021   Created by Paul Lincoln.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service