Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Charles Humphries on March 16, 2017 at 15:16

Thank you for taking the time to come down Mark, we appreciate the support. I think the path that the scheme is on is headed for difficulties and substantial delay at planning and the modest changes that we have requested will avoid these, save time and improve the quality of life all round for both the existing tenants and the new ones. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Hussain on March 18, 2017 at 22:26

Your right Charles, total rethink is essential, otherwise there will be delays and legal challenges.

The City is causing unnecessary distress, it is unethical, then again they have far greater percentage of support from the undemocratic, male biased dominated City business vote, ignoring and brushing aside the residential voters, lets hope they see sense and listen to everyone's views.

The City should have appointed a team from the resident based architects within Golden Lane. I would like the appointed architects to invite Golden Lane architects, and representatives to ensure total redesign before submitting to planning.

Prior to the Wardmote meeting on 22nd March 2017 at

Barber-Surgeons’ Hall
Monkwell Square
Wood Street
London EC2Y 5BL

I would like to read on this website the views of the existing Alderperson/Councillors, and Lord Mayor, as well as those from Jewin Welsh Church, 70 Fann Street, City, London EC1Y 0SA Tel: 020 76288370, as they will be affected by this and the Taylor Wimpey development, St Giles Cripplegate Church Fore Street, London EC2Y 8DA, Tel: 020 7638 1997, and the local business voters.

• ▶ Reply