Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Nick Sharp on March 2, 2017 at 0:15

Just to say thanks for sharing these Charles - had appreciated

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Nick Sharp on March 2, 2017 at 0:33

... receiving the copy of the response but also useful to see the proposal plans. 

[Bit quick on the trigger finger, sorry!]

Nick Sharp said:

Just to say thanks for sharing these Charles - had appreciated

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Charles Humphries on March 2, 2017 at 1:31

I have now added our detailed written breakdown of comments available for download. It runs to 14 pages before we have even seen the planning drawings, but if the scheme goes ahead as proposed without the modifications we have asked for then it will form the basis of our objections at the planning stage.

Just to summarise our main objections are:

• Height, density and proximity of resdiential tower block

• Location and height of School Hall

• Blank facade on Golden Lane

• Noise from playground (we are seeking s106 contribution to double glazing)

Attachments:

• RCS Consult response v3.pdf, 131 KB

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Iain Meek on March 5, 2017 at 13:26

All comments should be sent to jessicas@commcommuk.com who ran the consultation on 25th February and i believe are continuing to run consultations.

• ▶ Reply