Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by David Kreikmeier on July 13, 2017 at 19:21

Well Nancy - if Great Arthur House is anything to go by you've got 20 years to save up for your new windows, as that's how long it took us to finally get them!

If you were a sitting Council Tenant and bought you're place under Right-To-Buy the City will usually offer some sort of low interest rate loan for major works (dependent upon income).

If you bought the place on the open market, you probably need to sue your Surveyor and Solicitor if they didn't advise you against buying a 'planned life' expired ex-Council property [50-60 years planned life in the Estate specifications], situated on a badly maintained Council Estate where tenants are still the majority.

The City Housing Department is negligent in that the windows should have been replaced under the Decent Homes programme over 7 years ago - but no, as leaseholder you will find you have no right to "opt out" of necessary refurbishment.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Matt Startin on July 28, 2017 at 13:47

Hi, Where can we get information/detail on the window replacements? Are they going to be double glazed and conform to the listed status of the building? I can't seem to find any info and I too am astonished at the price of these replacements.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Tim Godsmark on October 17, 2017 at 9:36

All the feedback so far from the City is that no final decision has been taken yet to replace the windows in the maisonette block and they are looking at all possibilities. There are several issues including the need to replace the coloured panels under the windows, to improve thermal performance and to improve living conditions in flats where the occupants may not be able to afford much heating.

The buildings are listed and if they were built before 1900 then you would not be allowed to replace single with double glazing and it would be a requirement to keep the window frames. I am not sure why this is not the case with GLE. Great Arthur House, despite the expense, has shown that it is possible to maintain an approximation of the original frames with modern insulation standards and this approach would have to be maintained but having seen the way that this contract has been run a lot of residents would prefer to stick with what they have got.

The issues are disruption for everyone and cost for leaseholders and whether the gains will be worth this.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Matt Startin on October 18, 2017 at 20:32

Thanks for the update Tim. Much appreciated. 

• ▶ Reply